Royal Commission targets NDIS providers

The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability has opened with a hearing in Brisbane.

A “substantial number” of the largest NDIS providers are being ordered to provide information relating to complaints, investigations and reported incidents of violence and abuse.

The three-year Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability announced in April got underway in Brisbane this month.

In his opening address on September 16, commission chair Ronald Sackville said the inquiry has so far received 65 written submissions and will hold its first public hearings later this year.

Royal Commissioners (back L-R) Barbara Bennett, Andrea Mason, Alistair McEwen, John Ryan (front L-R) Rhonda Galbally, Ronald Sackville.

He said after numerous reports and investigations, the royal commission offered an opportunity for “transformational change” to improve the lives of people with disability and ensure their voices were heard.

“We do need to analyse why … people with disability continue to experience unacceptable levels of abuse and why the objective of a full and effective inclusion in society is so difficult to achieve,” he said.

“Why have the recommendations made in so many inquiries and reports not led to improvements in the lives of people with disability? That question is one we have to answer.”

Compulsory powers

Senior Counsel Assisting Rebecca Treston said the commission had compulsory powers to gather information and evidence.

“These include the power to issue notices requiring people to produce documents, things or information to the commission, to provide written statements or to attend and give evidence in person,” she said.

Ms Treston said while these powers would not be used to compel people with disability to provide information, they may be exercised if needed to obtain documents from government bodies, agencies, commercial organisations and support providers.

“First steps have already been taken,” she said.

“Last week the commission wrote to a substantial number of the largest NDIS providers putting them on notice that the commission will shortly issue them with formal notices to produce documents or to give information about the services they provide complaints, investigations and reported incidents of violence, abuse neglect and exploitation of people with disability in connection with those services. and policies and procedures to identify and manage such incidents.”

Conflict of interest concerns

Commissioner Sackville, who was joined by commissioners Barbara Bennett, Rhonda Galbally, Andrea Mason, Alistair McEwin and John Ryan, noted the concerns raised by some disability advocacy groups about a conflict of interest involving two commissioners.

The concerns are centred on former NSW MP Commissioner Ryan, who was involved in the oversight of residential programs for people with disability in NSW, and Commissioner Bennett who has previously worked for DSS.

Commissioner Sackville said as chair he would not allow a commissioner to participate in a public hearing if there was a perceived conflict of interest and no one would be compelled to give evidence in front of a commissioner they didn’t feel comfortable with.

People with Disability Australia spokeswoman El Gibbs said the comments were reassuring but said the organisation would continue to monitor the hearings closely for any signs of bias.

“We were really pleased to hear the chair address directly the conflict of interest that we have been raising for some time. We’re pleased that the commissioner is talking about it but it’s something that we’re going to keep watching,” she told Community Care Review.

Indigenous Australians

Commissioner Mason said the inquiry would “uncover uncomfortable truths”, but it would also give a voice to indigenous Australians with disability, whom she described as a marginalised group within a marginalised group.

“It’s from this place we will hear stories of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. It’s from this place that brave First Nations people will finally be heard,” she said.

Commissioner Mason said 7.3 per cent, or about 60,000 first nations people, have a severe or profound disability, compared with 5.8 per cent in the non-indigenous community, and they were twice as likely as others to have a severe or profound disability.

She promised the Royal Commission would be a safe place for them.

“We will listen with sympathy and empathy and consideration, identify the shortcomings, propose remedies and make certain that permanent solutions are reached for all Australians with disability to live their lives free of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. We are here for you.”

Ms Treston said the main issues raised in submissions so far related to housing , justice and health. The  the commission would examine these plus relationships, education, economic participation, health,  autonomy, dignity of risk, geographic challenges and community participation.

The first public hearings of the year are expected to focus on education and housing, and in particular restrictive practices, exclusion from education systems and the nature of housing in community and institutional settings.

Subscribe to Community Care Review

Tags: andrea-mason, community-care-review-slider, disability, disability-royal-commission, ronald-sackville, Royal-Commission-into-Violence-Abuse-Neglect-and-Exploitation-of-People-with-Disability,

1 thought on “Royal Commission targets NDIS providers

  1. The Royal Commission will hopefully look at the disparity in the current funding situation.
    An under 65 residing in an aged care facility attracts funding around $70,000 per year but when they are transferred to the alternate the funding jumps to over $300,000 per resident per year.
    How can that be justified especially when we have already seen the customer regression when exposed to this new “freedom” when removed from their safe environment and have access to the substances that quite often brought about their current situation?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *